In planning out my first handful of Blog
posts, this one was originally at the end of the 4 or 5 ideas I had loosely
jotted down as topics to write about. I
didn’t initially feel that talking about my own class and my teaching
assignment would be necessary when examining some very broad topics in
education to start of this Blog series.
Start big, and slowly work toward the details I figured.
But as I started to write those other
pieces, it quickly became apparent that trying to explain why I have a
particular view without the context of what I do serving as a backdrop would be
occasionally challenging. So this post
is getting an early call-up while the others hang out in the green room a bit
longer. To be fair, I also think that
there may be some inherent narcissism at play.
What Is Building Futures?
A quick glance at my About the Author box
will tell you that I teach high school science and math and that the class I
teach is a little different. But that
five-sentence blurb does nothing to convey how
different my classroom is.
Each year we take a group of Grade 10 students from across
two or three different high schools, and for 4 of their 5 school days every week they
show up at a garage behind a showhome in a residential housing development
instead of to their schools. The garage itself
is actually a one-room schoolhouse.
There are lockers along one wall, whiteboards and a projector screen
opposite them, and tables and chairs throughout the space. Rolling shelves store school supplies, a
metal lab cart houses a coffee maker, a kettle, and a microwave. A wireless router tucked in a windowsill provides
a blinking LED symphony of data for kids who are all expected to have their own
laptops or tablets in tow each day (for those who can’t manage the cost of a
device, their school arranges a loaner).
Directly across the alley from the garage
are two single-family homes that will start as little more than empty lots in
September, and by May will be fully constructed houses ready to be sold as spec
homes by a small, local residential builder.
During the course of the construction our intrepid group of 14 to 16
year olds will spend half days in groups of 2 to 4 on these work sites learning
how the various components of these houses get assembled to make a finished,
livable home. Part of that learning
includes hands-on assembly of those components.
Students will frame walls, hang doors, pull wire, cut drain pipes, screw
on drywall, install hardwood, mortar stonework, lay tile, and paint walls. By the end of their school year, they’ll be
able to say they helped to build two houses all the way from hole-in-the-ground
to keys-in-the-hand.
On first examination, it already seems
pretty progressive – hands-on learning, real-life relevance, and an immersive
environment. But those pieces are really
only the tip of the iceberg that makes the Building Futures program
special. Here are some other non-trivial
differences as compared to a “normal” grade 10 experience:
·
We teachers are with the same
class of 30ish kids all year. 5 days a
week, 10 months in a row. That’s a
pretty big departure from my previous life in a regular school setting, where I
would often see over 100 kids in a day, some for no more than 9 weeks in a term
before getting new sets of faces. It’s
not uncommon to encounter high school teachers in our jurisdiction who interact
formally with 150 or more different students over the course of a single school
year.
·
There are no bells and no
scheduling blocks. Some days Math
happens in the morning, others in the afternoon. Some days we don’t do Math at all.
·
We have a full year to cover
all our curricular objectives, not just a semester.
·
The program accepts all levels
of student academically. On first blush,
it sounds like the kind of schooling one would only put a vocational student
into, one eventually bound to work in the industry the program is aligned
with. In fact, we get all kinds of kids
applying – some who just want a different school experience and some looking
for some practical life experience whether they’re interested in the trades or
not. Some kids hear that the teaching
and learning looks a lot different that what they’re used to, and they’re
attracted to the program for that reason alone.
·
The diverse group necessitates
that we teach a variety of levels of course material simultaneously. I deliver an academic science course (Science
10 for you readers familiar with the Alberta system) and a vocational course
(Science 14). The same is true for Math
(10C, 10-3, and 10-4), English (10-1 and 10-2), and Social Studies (10-1 and
10-2). This demands both creativity and
flexibility in terms of the ways that lessons, assessments, and projects must
be delivered. The one-room schoolhouse
of years gone-by is probably more comparable to what our environment looks like
than most modern classrooms.
·
The other teacher who I work
with occupies the same space and works with the same set of kids. That means we have opportunities to be
collaborative at an unparalleled level.
We essentially get to team teach every grade 10 course. The opportunities for cross-curricular
connections and projects are totally unparalleled. And that’s to say nothing of the value of
having another professional set of eyes on your practice as a teacher.
·
Our students meet over 40 different
“teachers” throughout the year in the form of trades professionals,
construction supervisors, sales and marketing staff, service providers, and
company owners. Not only do they get a very
real opportunity to discover a variety of professions and learn from the people
who work in them, they also get to make connections with those professionals,
connections that can lead to summer jobs, apprenticeship placements, work
experience, and possibly future careers.
At this point, I feel it’s necessary to give
credit where credit is due. I did not
invent this program. I am, at best, an
opportunistic thief. Two educators in
Airdrie, Alberta (Jarrett Hooper and Greg Rankin of George McDougall High)
conceived the program over the course of a number of morning commutes together
four years ago. A year after forming a
partnership with McKee Homes of Airdrie and completing their inaugural year of
Building Futures Airdrie, we picked up the program, in partnership with Kingsmith Homes
of Cochrane. The Airdrie school is currently in
its third year, while we are in our second. To say that those two gentlemen have my admiration and gratitude would be a gross understatement.
It’s certainly not a perfect program nor the model upon which I think all education should be crafted. We encounter challenges in one form or
another daily, and I look forward to writing about some of them here. Nonetheless, it’s been an educational game-changer
in my opinion. Over the course of the
next few blog posts, I hope to make a convincing argument that the crux of what
makes Building Futures successful should form the backbone of high
school transformations in any building where the path to progressive pedagogy is
unclear or resisted.
TL;DR: I teach in a really cool program that is hands-on, authentic, cross-curricular, collaborative, and worth sharing.
Vive la revolution!
TL;DR: I teach in a really cool program that is hands-on, authentic, cross-curricular, collaborative, and worth sharing.
Vive la revolution!
No comments:
Post a Comment